|
Updated April 18, 2003 Plain Language Association International |
A Crash Course in Plain Legal LanguageBy Cheryl StephensThere are three common problems in writing style for writers of legal discourse:
When a verb is converted to a noun it has been "nominalized". A nominalization of a verb can be used as a subject, object, or whatever else a noun is used for. The problem is the vibrant actions are converted to wooden nouns - an olympic gymnast becomes a stick man. This makes legal prose heavy and unclear. Here are some examples:
Passive verbs take the opposite tack to active verbs. With active verbs, the subject of the sentence is the actor or doer. With passive verbs, the thing done becomes the subject of the sentence and has something done to it. Here are two sentences, one passive, one active:
In The Transitive Vampire, Karen Gordon comments on the use of passive voice constructions:
Another legal habit is putting the things that negate or form exceptions or limitations to the front of the sentence or paragraph. The main point - the basic principle - is relegated to the back of the line. This is the opposite of how people think and it makes comprehension difficult. Make your reader comfortable by driving your point home first. Also avoid putting things negatively. Restate in a positive construction. We didn't do more than this. <---> We did this. There are many published lists of maxims for how to write better, simpler and more clearly. Pick the one you like best and post it above your work space. © 1995 by Cheryl Stephens |